Interface fluid syndrome caused by the corneal perforation injury after small incision lenticule extraction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: To report a case of interface fluid syndrome (IFS) following traumatic corneal perforation repair after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old woman, with a past history of SMILE, was struck in the left eye with a barbecue prod and subsequently underwent corneal perforation repair at local hospital. Primary wound repaired with a single 10 - 0 nylon suture at the area of leakage. After the surgery, her best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/30. Four days later, she presented at our hospital with blurred vision, and interface fluid syndrome (IFS) was diagnosed. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) was used to guide the resuturing of the corneal perforation in the left eye, followed by anterior chamber gas injection. At the first postoperative month, the BCVA was 20/25. The corneal cap adhered closely to the stroma, the surface became smooth. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that any corneal perforation following lamellar surgery, including SMILE, may lead to IFS. It is crucial to consider the depth of corneal perforation, and intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) plays a unique role in the repair procedure.

Comparison of refractive surgeries (SMILE, LASIK, and PRK) with and without corneal crosslinking: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is used for treating keratoconus and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia. However, refractive surgery is not usually performed with prophylactic CXL. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of refractive surgeries with vs without prophylactic CXL. We systematically searched databases for studies comparing refractive surgeries for myopic correction with vs without prophylactic corneal crosslinking. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to perform statistical analysis. We included 2820 eyes from 28 studies. Compared with refractive surgery alone, surgery with prophylactic CXL resulted in decreased central corneal thickness, corrected distance visual acuity logMAR, and safety and efficacy indices. There were no significant differences in postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better at ≥12 months and other visual outcomes among both groups. More randomized controlled trials with standard crosslinking protocols are needed to analyze the prophylactic use of crosslinking with refractive surgeries.

Predictability of the Achieved Lenticule Thickness in Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Correction.

PURPOSE: To assess the predictability between the SCHWIND ATOS femtosecond laser (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) read-out and achieved lenticule thickness measured using MS-39 anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT; CSO) at the corneal vertex at postoperative 1 day and 1 and 3 months of follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 130 eyes of 65 consecutive patients who were treated with SmartSight (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) lenticule extraction. Sixty-four percent of patients were women with a mean spherical refraction of -4.98 ± 1.19 diopters (D) and mean astigmatism of 0.53 ± 0.64 D. The measurements were performed using AS-OCT with the Phoenix Software v 4.1.1.5. Lenticule thickness was obtained by the subtraction method between preoperative and postoperative total corneal thickness. RESULTS: A lower reduction in central corneal thickness (CCT) compared to the laser read-out for all three follow-up visits can be observed. Essentially, the reduction in CCT was identical at 3 months versus 1 month. The reduction in CCT was lowest at postoperative 1 day. Examining the 1- and 3-month data (essentially equivalent), one can see a best fit of y = 0.94 x -7 µm. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in CCT was stable from 1 month of follow-up. The stable reduction in CCT was -6% (-1.5% after accounting for design decisions) and -7 µm lower than the respective laser read-out. The findings are predictable, showing a certain level of the lenticules becoming slightly thinner than their respective laser read-outs. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):728-735.].

Central corneal distortion after small-incision lenticule extraction.

A 33-year-old woman with a prior history of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) presented with gradual deterioration of vision in her right eye since the surgery. She had undergone bilateral SMILE for myopic correction (-7.00 diopters [D] in the right eye and -6.00 D in the left eye) 3 weeks prior. SMILE was performed with a Zeiss VisuMax femtosecond laser system, with a cap thickness of 120 µm, a cap diameter of 7.50 mm, and a lenticule diameter of 6.50 mm. At the completion of the surgery, loose epithelium was noted at the SMILE incision bilaterally, and bandage contact lenses were placed in both eyes. On the first postoperative day, the patient's uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/40 in both eyes. The bandage lenses were removed from both eyes, with the epithelium intact. At the first-week postoperative visit, her visual acuity was recorded as 20/30 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. She noticed her vision in the right eye was not as sharp as that in her left eye. She denied experiencing any pain, redness, or ocular surface irritations. She was advised to return to the clinic for a 1-month postoperative visit and continue with aggressive lubrication in both eyes. However, a week later, the patient returned for an emergency visit, citing significant central visual distortion in the right eye and difficulty working on the computer. At this visit, her UDVA and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/50 in the right eye and 20/15 in the left eye at both near and far distances. A slitlamp examination revealed mild central changes in the right eye. She once again denied any pain, redness, or irritation. She was advised to continue with artificial tears and return to the office in 1 week for further observation of the central distortion in her right eye. Upon returning to the clinic at the third postoperative week, the patient still complained of central visual changes in the right eye, with a visual acuity of 20/70. Further slitlamp examination revealed a nonspecific central haze in the same eye, but there was no corneal staining or signs of epithelial defects. Anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and NIDEK topography were performed, showing the same central distortion in the right eye (Figures 1 and 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202311000-00016/figure1/v/2023-10-18T004638Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202311000-00016/figure2/v/2023-10-18T004638Z/r/image-tiff). Based on the examination and images provided, what is your working medical diagnosis? What other medical conditions are in your differential diagnosis? What medical and/or surgical interventions would you recommend, if any?

Corneal remodeling after SMILE for moderate and high myopia: short-term assessment of spatial changes in corneal volume and thickness.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the early corneal remodeling and its influencing factors after Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Pre- and post-operative (1 week and 1, 3, 6 months) corneal volume (CV), mean keratometry (Km), and corneal thickness (CT) were measured by Scheimpflug tomography. CT at the central, thinnest point, and on concentric circles of 2, 4, and 6 mm diameter was recorded to assess corneal thickness spatial profile (CTSP) and percentage of thickness increase (PTI) in the moderate and high myopia groups, and to explore possible influencing factors. RESULTS: After SMILE, the peripheral CT decreased in the moderate myopia group and central corneal thickness (CCT) increased in the high myopia group at 1 month compared to 1 week (all P < 0.05). The CV, Km and CT were significantly increased at 3 months compared to 1 month (all P < 0.05), but there was no significant change at 6 months compared to 3 months for both groups (all P > 0.05). Patients with high myopia showed greater corneal thickness changes (△CT) and higher PTI than moderate myopia (all P < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that in addition to refraction, peripheral PTI was negatively correlated with CCT in the moderate myopia group (4 mm: ß = -0.023, P = 0.001; 6 mm: ß = -0.050, P < 0.001), as well as in the high myopia group (4 mm: ß = -0.038, P < 0.001; 6 mm: ß = -0.094, P < 0.001). Moreover, peripheral PTI in the moderate myopia group was negatively correlated with age (4 mm: ß = -0.071, P = 0.003; 6 mm: ß = -0.162, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After SMILE, the CV, Km, and CTSP showed dynamic changes in the early stage, which stabilized after 3 months. Compared to the moderate myopia group, the high myopia group experienced slower corneal stabilization. The change in PTI at 6 months after SMILE may be related to higher preoperative refraction, thinner CCT and younger age.

Electron beam-irradiated donor cornea for on-demand lenticule implantation to treat corneal diseases and refractive error.

The cornea is the major contributor to the refractive power of the eye, and corneal diseases are a leading cause of reversible blindness. The main treatment for advanced corneal disease is keratoplasty: allograft transplantation of the cornea. Examples include lenticule implantation to treat corneal disorders (e.g. keratoconus) or correct refractive errors. These procedures are limited by the shelf-life of the corneal tissue, which must be discarded within 2-4 weeks. Electron-beam irradiation is an emerging sterilisation technique, which extends this shelf life to 2 years. Here, we produced lenticules from fresh and electron-beam (E-beam) irradiated corneas to establish a new source of tissue for lenticule implantation. In vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo experiments were conducted to compare fresh and E-beam-irradiated lenticules. Results were similar in terms of cutting accuracy, ultrastructure, optical transparency, ease of extraction and transplantation, resilience to mechanical handling, biocompatibility, and post-transplant wound healing process. Two main differences were noted. First, ∼59% reduction of glycosaminoglycans resulted in greater compression of E-beam-irradiated lenticules post-transplant, likely due to reduced corneal hydration-this appeared to affect keratometry after implantation. Cutting a thicker lenticule would be required to ameliorate the difference in refraction. Second, E-beam-sterilised lenticules exhibited lower Young's modulus which may indicate greater care with handling, although no damage or perforation was caused in our procedures. In summary, E-beam-irradiated corneas are a viable source of tissue for stromal lenticules, and may facilitate on-demand lenticule implantation to treat a wide range of corneal diseases. Our study suggested that its applications in human patients are warranted. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Corneal blindness affects over six million patients worldwide. For patients requiring corneal transplantation, current cadaver-based procedures are limited by the short shelf-life of donor tissue. Electron-beam (E-beam) sterilisation extends this shelf-life from weeks to years but there are few published studies of its use. We demonstrated that E-beam-irradiated corneas are a viable source of lenticules for implantation. We conducted in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo comparisons of E-beam and fresh corneal lenticules. The only differences exhibited by E-beam-treated lenticules were reduced expression of glycosaminoglycans, resulting in greater tissue compression and lower refraction suggesting that a thicker cut is required to achieve the same optical and refractive outcome; and lower Young's modulus indicating extra care with handling.

Subjective patient-reported visual quality after small-incision lenticule extraction and its correlation to the objective one.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to characterize the subjective visual quality and satisfaction following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and to identify its influential factors. SETTING: Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. METHODS: Patients who had simultaneous binocular SMILE for myopia and myopic astigmatism were included 6 months postoperatively, and the patient-reported outcome questionnaire was employed for the assessment of visual quality in real-life situations. Examinations with SIRIUS combined corneal topography and tomography were performed including the parameters of Strehl ratio (SR), corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) within 6.0-mm area, kappa angel, and thinnest corneal thickness. Decentration and effective optical zone (EOZ) were measured based on a tangential pre-post-operation difference map. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed for predictors of patient-reported visual quality. RESULTS: Clinical data from 97 cases were analyzed retrospectively. Overall satisfaction was 96.91% (94/97). Fluctuation in vision and glare is the most frequent and dominant visual symptoms. SR value increased non-significantly compared with preoperative (P> 0.05). A statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase in total HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma was noted. SR and HOAs were not correlated with the degree of visual symptoms (P > 0.05). No objective parameter was found to be associated with patient-reported visual quality after SMILE (P> 0.05). CONCLUSION: The high patient-reported satisfaction confirmed the ideal effect on visual quality following SMILE in real-life situations, though some objective optical performances were not satisfying. It is very tolerant toward patients' conditions and mild deviations, and this study did not find factors affecting visual performances.

An Efficient Technique for the Long-term Preservation of SMILE Lenticules Using Desiccation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a desiccation protocol for the long-term preservation of human small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticules and to study their integration in an in vivo rabbit model. METHODS: Lenticules were retrieved after SMILE procedures in patients, then desiccated according to a novel protocol. Histologic and electron microscopic analyses were performed. Six rabbit eyes received grafts with an inlay technique, which consisted of inserting a desiccated lenticule into a stromal pocket. Rabbits were killed at different times between 6 and 24 weeks. Rabbit corneas were analyzed using optical coherence tomography, histology, and DAPI staining. RESULTS: Microscopic analysis of desiccated lenticules showed a preserved stromal architecture after rehydration. A decellularization of the lenticules after desiccation was observed without any chemical treatment. All rabbit corneas remained clear after grafting human lenticules and no rejection occurred. Optical coherence tomography showed regular lenticular implantation and no decrease in lenticule thickness. Histologic analysis showed no inflammatory infiltration around lenticules and no nuclear material inside lenticules after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: A favorable integration of desiccated human SMILE lenticules in rabbit corneas was observed. The refractive issue of lenticular implantation must be investigated next. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the use of desiccated SMILE lenticules to treat hyperopia or keratoconus in humans. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(7):491-498.].

Comparative analysis of visual outcomes following small-incision lenticule extraction with or without cyclotorsion compensation in eyes with high astigmatism: Contralateral eye study.

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes in patients undergoing small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correction of myopic astigmatism (≥-1.50 D) with or without manual cyclotorsion compensation. Methods: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, contralateral study was conducted in the refractive services of a tertiary eye care center. Eligible patients with bilateral high myopic astigmatism (≥1.5 D) and intraoperative cyclotorsion (≥5°) undergoing SMILE between June 2018 and May 2019 were included. Cyclotorsion compensation was performed using triple centration method before femtosecond laser delivery. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, respectively) measurement, manifest refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and corneal tomography were performed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months' postoperative visit. Astigmatic outcomes were analyzed using Alpins criteria. Results: A total of 30 patients (60 eyes) were included in this study. The patients underwent bilateral SMILE surgery, with manual cyclotorsion compensation in one eye (CC group, n = 30 eyes) and no cyclotorsion compensation in the other eye (NCC group, n = 30 eyes). Preoperative astigmatism and intraoperative cyclotorsion were -2.0 D and 7.03° ± 1.06° (CC) and -1.75 D and 7.24° ± 0.98° (NCC) (P = 0.472 and 0.240, respectively). No significant differences were noted in mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), UDVA, CDVA, and refractive error between the two groups at 3 months' postoperative visit. Astigmatic outcomes measured using Alpins criteria demonstrated no significant difference between the two cohorts. Conclusion: The cyclotorsion compensation technique provided no additional advantage in terms of astigmatic outcomes or postoperative visual quality, in eyes with high preoperative astigmatism and intraoperative cyclotorsion.

Higher-order aberrations and visual quality after incision lenticule extraction surgery with intraoperative angle kappa adjustments between small and large kappa patients: A 2-year follow-up.

Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative visual outcomes, that is, corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and visual quality, of patients with an angle kappa greater than 0.30 mm who underwent angle kappa adjustment during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) 2 years after surgery compared to eyes with an angle kappa less than 0.30 mm. Methods: This was a retrospective study and included 12 patients from October 2019 to December 2019 who underwent the SMILE procedure for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism and had one eye with a large kappa angle and another eye with a small kappa angle. Twenty-four months after surgery, an optical quality analysis system (OQAS II; Visiometrics, Terrassa, Spain) was used to measure the modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTFcutoff), Strehl2D ratio, and objective scatter index (OSI). HOAs were measured with a Tracey iTrace Visual Function Analyzer (Tracey version 6.1.0; Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX, USA). Assessment of subjective visual quality was achieved using the quality of vision (QOV) questionnaire. Results: At 24 months postoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was - 0.32 ± 0.40 and - 0.31 ± 0.35 in the S-kappa group (kappa <0.3 mm) and the L-kappa group (kappa ≥0.3 mm), respectively (P > 0.05). The mean OSI was 0.73 ± 0.32 and 0.81 ± 0.47, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in MTFcutoff and Strehl2D ratio between the two groups (P > 0.05). Total HOA, coma, spherical, trefoil, and secondary astigmatism were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between the two groups. Conclusion: Adjustment of angle kappa during SMILE helps reduce the decentration, results in less HOAs, and promotes visual quality. It provides a reliable method to optimize the treatment concentration in SMILE.

Biomechanical Responses of Different Cap Thicknesses of Corneas After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: Finite Element Analysis.

Purpose: This study analyzed the biomechanical responses of different corneal cap thicknesses after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: Individual finite element models of myopic eyes were constructed based on the clinical data. Then, four types of corneal cap thicknesses after SMILE were included for each model. The biomechanical effects of material parameters and intraocular pressure on corneas with different cap thicknesses were analyzed. Results: When the cap thickness increased, the vertex displacements of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces decreased slightly. The corneal stress distributions demonstrated little change. Regarding wave-front aberrations caused by the displacements of the anterior surface, the absolute defocus value decreased slightly, but the magnitude of primary spherical aberration increased slightly. The horizontal coma increased, and the levels of other low-order and high-order aberrations were small and demonstrated little change. The corneal vertex displacement and wave-front aberration were significantly affected by elastic modulus and intraocular pressure, whereas the corneal stress distribution was greatly affected by intraocular pressure. There were obvious individual differences in the biomechanical responses of human eyes. Conclusions: The biomechanical difference of different corneal cap thicknesses after SMILE was small. The effect of corneal cap thickness was significantly less than that resulting from material parameters and intraocular pressure. Translational Relevance: Individual models were constructed based on the clinical data. The elastic modulus was controlled by programming to simulate its heterogeneous distribution in the actual human eye. The simulation was improved to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical care.

Digital light processing-bioprinted poly-NAGA-GelMA-based hydrogel lenticule for precise refractive errors correction.

Refractive disorder is the most prevalent cause of visual impairment worldwide. While treatment of refractive errors can bring improvement to quality of life and socio-economic benefits, there is a need for individualization, precision, convenience, and safety with the chosen method. Herein, we propose using pre-designed refractive lenticules based on poly-NAGA-GelMA (PNG) bio-inks photo-initiated by digital light processing (DLP)-bioprinting for correcting refractive errors. DLP-bioprinting allows PNG lenticules to have individualized physical dimensions with precision achievable to 10µm (µm). Material characteristics of PNG lenticules in tests included optical and biomechanical stability, biomimetical swelling and hydrophilic capability, nutritional and visual functionality, supporting its suitability as stromal implants. Cytocompatibility distinguished by morphology and function of corneal epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells on PNG lenticules suggested firm adhesion, over 90% viability, phenotypic maintenance instead of excessive keratocyte-myofibroblast transformation.In-vitroimmune response analyzed by illumina RNA sequencing in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells indicated that PNG lenticules activated type-2 immunity, facilitating tissue regeneration and suppressing inflammation.In-vivoperformance assessed using intrastromal keratoplasty models in New Zealand white rabbits illustrated that implantation of PNG lenticules maintained stable optical pathway, induced controlled stromal bio-integration and regeneration, avoided complications such as stromal melt, interface scarring, etc, but exerted no adverse effects on the host. Postoperative follow-up examination on intraocular pressure, corneal sensitivity, and tear production remained unaffected by surgery up to 1-month post-implantation of PNG lenticules. DLP-bioprinted PNG lenticule is a bio-safe and functionally effective stromal implants with customizable physical dimensions, providing potential therapeutic strategies in correction of refractive errors.

Refractive Outcome After Corneal Lenticule Implantation Ex Vivo Non-Human Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in corneal refractive parameters after implantation of a stromal lenticule of different thickness. We assume that the refractive outcome depends on the optical power of the used lenticule. METHODS: We conducted an ex-vivo non-human study on 33 normotonic porcine eyeballs divided into two groups, for 4D and 8D human lenticule implantation. Corneal stromal lenticules were obtained as a by-product from a laser procedure ReLEx SMILE. We evaluated corneal refractive parameters measured on Oculus Pentacam© device before and immediately after the intrastromal lenticule implantation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in corneal refractive parameters between the eyeball groups before lenticule implantation. In both groups, the intrastromal implantation in the depth of 300um led to a significant increase of central corneal pachymetry and corneal anterior steepening. In the 4D group the average central corneal pachymetry increased from 903 ± 124.59 to 1230 ± 148.99 (p = 0.0022) and in 8D group from 733.35 ± 69.60 to 1109 ± 161.64 (p = 0.0008). Induced changes in other studied parameters were not statistically significant, Kmax changed from 45.57 ± 2.78 to 72.07 ± 16.83 (p = 0.0094) and Km front from 40.72 ± 1.60 to 48.87 ± 5.83 (p = 0.0037) in 4D group and in the 8D group average Kmax increased from 42.22 ± 1.54 to 62.95 ± 12.67 (p = 0.0001) and K2 front 40.46 ± 1.64 to 51.51 ± 9.63 (p = 0.0037). There were no significant differences in refractive changes between the 4D and 8D groups after lenticule implantation. CONCLUSION: Intrastromal corneal lenticule implantation induces changes in corneal refractive parameters. In both groups, the implantation induced a significant increase of an anterior corneal steepening without any significant influence on posterior corneal flattening. Corneal lenticule implantation did not lead to any significant change of corneal astigmatism. However, in order to have more precise data for future clinical applications we need to continue with the experiments and verify the results on human corneas.

The effects of programmed optical zones on achieved corneal refractive power with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a vector analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of different programmed optical zones (POZs) on achieved corneal refractive power (CRP) with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: In total, 113 patients (113 eyes) were included in this retrospective study. The eyes were divided into two groups according to POZ: group A (6.5, 6.6, and 6.7 mm, n = 59) and group B (6.8, 6.9, and 7.0 mm, n = 54). Fourier vector analysis was applied to evaluate the error values between the attempted and achieved corneal refractive power (CRP). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME), and astigmatism correction index (ACI). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess potential factors associated with the error values. RESULTS: The error values in the group with large POZ were closer to zero, and significantly associated with the POZ at 2 and 4 mm of the cornea (ß = - 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 0.80, - 0.20]; ß = - 0.37, 95% CI [- 0.63, - 0.10], P < 0.05, respectively). For the correction of astigmatism, the values of SIA, ME, and ACI were lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). The fitting curves between TIA and SIA were y = 0.83x + 0.19 (R2 = 0.84) and y = 1.05x + 0.04 (R2 = 0.90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller POZs resulted in higher error values between the achieved- and attempted-CRP in the SMILE procedure, which should be considered when performing surgery.

Methods of Corneal Vertex Centration and Evaluation of Effective Optical Zone in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Inappropriate small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) centration methods can affect the decentration of the effective optical zone (EOZ) after operation, which can subsequently lead to the decline of postoperative visual quality. We aimed to provide an overview of corneal vertex (CV) centration methods and an evaluation of the size and decentration of the EOZ in SMILE. We described the CV centration methods for patients with myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle. The measurement methods of the EOZ were evaluated from the aspects of corneal morphology and corneal refractive power. Additionally, we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of measuring decentration based on topographic mapping and intraoperative video-captured images. Finally, we discussed the relationship between the EOZ and visual quality. Based on our review, clinicians should consider the following when choosing CV centration methods and evaluating EOZ postoperatively. First, the tear film mark center or topographic map comparison method is preferred for the correction of myopia, low myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle (>0.2 mm). Triple marking centration is recommended for high myopic astigmatism (-3.5 diopters). Second, the total corneal power better reflects the change in refractive power than the topographic method. The measurement of the area rather than the diameter of the total corneal refractive power is more suitable for the evaluation of noncircular EOZs after high myopia astigmatism (<-2.0 diopters). Third, for the evaluation of decentration, the tangential curvature difference map method is preferred as it is not influenced by offset pupils. Finally, a large EOZ after SMILE may improve patient tolerance to decentration.

Safety and efficacy of low-energy small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: A retrospective analysis.

Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of low-energy settings in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. Methods: We included patients aged ≥18 years with the myopia of -0.5 to -10 D and myopic astigmatism of -0.5 to -5 Dcyl in this retrospective case series performed at a private eye hospital in South India. All patients had preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of LogMar 0.0 ± 0, with stable refraction for 1 year and normal corneal topography. Ocular surface disease and other pathology cases were excluded. The repetition rate of the laser was 500 kHz, and the pulse energy was 110 nJ. The lenticule diameter was set at 6.5 mm, cap diameter was 7.20 mm, and intended cap thickness was 110-130 µ. The spot distance was 4.5 µm. All patients were evaluated immediately postoperation and on postoperative days 1, 8, and 30. Results: Overall, 541 eyes were included. The mean patient age was 25.03 ± 4.1 years. The mean spherical error was -3.76 ± 1.84 Ds. The mean cylinder was -1.24 ± 0.91. The mean spherical equivalent of refraction was -4.22 ±1.94 D. The logMAR on postoperative day 1 was 0.0 ± 0. The mean spherical equivalent at 1 month was 0.28 ± 1.06 D. There was no loss of Snellen's lines after the procedure. The mean spherical equivalent of refraction to the target was 95% within ± 0.50 D. The postoperative astigmatism was within 0.5 Dycl. No intraoperative complications of SMILE including retained lenticule fragments, tears of incision, or improper dissection occurred. Conclusion: Low-energy settings in SMILE are safe and effective in correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism including high cylinders (>3 Dcyl).

SMILE lenticule versus amniotic membrane graft (AMG) augmented with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of perforated corneal ulcer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stromal lenticule obtained from small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery versus amniotic membrane graft (AMG) augmented with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of perforated corneal ulcers and compare the results between the two groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a comparative retrospective study that included 40 eyes with medium-sized corneal perforations, which were classified into two equal groups of 20 eyes each; group (A) was treated with SMILE lenticule graft and group (B) was treated with AMG augmented with PRP. Pre- and postoperative evaluations were carried out using both slit-lamp (SL) examination and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), including closure of perforation, complete healing, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Complete closure of the perforation was achieved in both groups. However, healing was faster in the SMILE lenticule group than in the AMG with PRP group (P < 0.05). Complete healing was achieved in both groups: 100% in SMILE lenticule group and 95% in AMG with PRP group (P > 0.05). Both groups had few insignificant complications (30% in each), which were managed. CONCLUSION: Both methods achieved adequate healing of corneal perforations within few weeks without significant complications. However, the stromal lenticule obtained from small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery tended to be safer with faster healing than AMG with PRP.

The Impact of Corneal Epithelial Thickening and Inhomogeneity on Corneal Aberrations After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the corneal epithelial remodeling profile after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), the correlated explanatory variables, and its potential impact on corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs). METHODS: This single-center study prospectively evaluated 75 right eyes of 75 patients scheduled for SMILE. An anterior segment optical coherence tomography device was used to automatically obtain central 6-mm corneal epithelial thickness (ET), total corneal HOAs, and individual Zernike components before and after surgery. The ET inhomogeneity over the central 3- and 6-mm cornea was quantified with coefficient of variance (CV). RESULTS: Both ET and CV significantly increased 1 month postoperatively (all P < .05). The stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that ET and CV were significantly correlated with preoperative ET and CV, respectively (all P < .01). The corrected spherical equivalent also significantly influenced ET and CV (all P < .01). Over the central 6-mm zone, the alterations of total corneal HOAs and individual Zernike components such as vertical coma (Z7) and spherical aberration (Z12, Z24) were significantly correlated with ET and CV (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The SMILE-induced epithelial remodeling involved both ET and ET inhomogeneity. The modulation was associated with preoperative and treatment parameters, and exerted a significant impact on corneal HOA alterations especially over the central 6-mm cornea. Together with the amount of correction and corneal curvature gradient change, preoperative assessment of ET and ET inhomogeneity might help predict postoperative epithelial remodeling. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(1):23-32.].

Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses.

BACKGROUND: The design of cap thickness for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) plays a role in post-laser vision correction (post-LVC) corneal biomechanics. This study aimed to compare the corneal biomechanical characteristics following SMILE with different cap thicknesses of 110 µm, 120 µm, and 130 µm for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (146 eyes) who underwent SMILE with designed cap thickness of 110 µm, 120 µm, and 130 µm were recruited at the Eye Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between August 2020 and November 2021. Visual acuity, refraction, and corneal biomechanical parameters were measured preoperatively, 1 week and 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively. One-way analysis of variances (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction or Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the parameters among different groups. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction or Friedman test was applied for comparing the parameters within different follow-up times. RESULTS: Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 110-µm group was better only at 1-week and 1-month postoperatively (P = 0.012, 0.037). There were no significant differences in spherical equivalent, nor in Corvis biomechanical index-laser vision correction (CBI-LVC). All the parameters reached stability at 3-month postoperatively. Integrated radius (IR) and deformation amplitude ratio 2 mm (DA ratio 2 mm) in 120-µm and 130-µm groups were higher than 110-µm group at 1-month postoperatively (P = 0.019, 0.002). So was Ambrósio relational thickness (ARTh) at 6-month postoperatively (P = 0.011). Stiffness parameter at applanation A1 (SP-A1), stress-strain index (SSI), biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were highest in 130-µm group, followed by 120-µm group, then 110-µm group at 3-month (P<0.001, P = 0.030, P = 0.027, P = 0.008) and 6-month (P<0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.0023, P = 0.001) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The corneal stiffness following SMILE was greatest with 130-µm cap, followed by 120-µm cap, then 110-µm cap. 130-µm cap might have advantages in terms of corneal biomechanics and retreatment option. The SMILE-designed protocol should be customized in practice.